Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberAnt

And then who would pay?

Just imagine if this is 2006, it's a GOP v. Cantwell and we're in deep red Spokane County this time? But everything else is the same.

Food for thought.


36 posted on 01/31/2005 2:42:24 PM PST by Josef1235 (My blog: http://josef-a-k.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Josef1235

The real point is - WA state has got to make some kind of move to change their election laws. It can be done if you have a good organization to do it.

So .. the point isn't the location of the voting problems .. but what laws govern the voting problems.

However .. a reasonable dispute - such as if the margin of winning is 500 votes or less - then it becomes the state's obligation to pay for the machine recount. I believe the law already states that the hand recount is paid for by the party asking for the hand recount and the dems did that. Then that only leaves a rule change for who pays for a revote. If there was malfeasance in the original vote - then rules need to be made as to who is responsible for the revote - the party that was harmed - or the party which committed the malfeasance. That's going to be a tough decision.


38 posted on 01/31/2005 3:52:59 PM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson