The difference is that Darwin and the scientists who have followed use data collected via the scientific method. What data does the ID side use?
Isn't the scientific method, hypthesis, experiment, either doesn't negate hypothesis, or negates it, which leads to a new hypothesis. The key point is an experiment, something physical that can test the hypothesis. Could you please give me some links to the experiments run to verify the theory of macro-evolution (cow into walrus, frog into kitten. etc.)
So then, data collected via revelation is not as strong as data collected via the scientific method? Who better to receive the data from than the Designer? You see, I still think it comes down to an issue of choice or acceptance. (P.S. Rudder, I appreciate the politeness and respect with which you reply!)
So then, data collected via revelation is not as strong as data collected via the scientific method? Who better to receive the data from than the Designer? You see, I still think it comes down to an issue of choice or acceptance. (P.S. Rudder, I appreciate the politeness and respect with which you reply!)