Intelligent design is not SCIENCE. So it should not be taught in a SCIENCE class.
Whether or not evolution is a valid scientific theory is disputed by a proportionally very small number of scientists. Fine, spend a little time in SCIENCE class covering their points, but not a disproportionate amount of time.
Trying to redefine what SCIENCE is by legislating it is ridiculous.
Why not? Because you have something to protect by owning what true 'science' really is?
Fess up. 'Science' has an underlying agenda. It is an agenda with vested interests, exactly the same way the NEA is a vested interest.
Scientists vote OVERWHELMINGLY for liberal democrats (and if communists were actually on the ticket, they'd get that vote).
And finally, if ID was such a non-issue, if evolution was so obvious, why have the scientists been so successful in failing to explain it in such a way that it is as believable as ..... gravity. You'll notice few Christians will stand up and say "Gravity is not real, it's just faith".
Scientists, in my opinion, deliberately obfuscate what ToE is, and when public high school science teachers are screwing up how their students can even THINK about it, the great professors of reason in our trustworthy illustrious intitutions of glorious higher learning remain ..... deadly quiet.
Just why is that? How are scientists incented to keep your average american kid dirt stupid via our public school system? Ohhhhhhhh .... they're not incented to do so, right? I'm quite fed up with the outright lies of scientists regarding what 'science', really now, is ...
That is the bottom line; scientists know that the definition of science itself is under attack .... and they're not about to give up their monopoly without a fight.
The NEA recently announced they are issuing pom poms to its science teachers to help bolster morale. After all, as a client monopoly, they have a lot to lose as well....