[jennyp]

I>None of my post was "cut and paste" from any creationist web site.

I searched on google for Senapathy "If the mutation rate is constant" and found this page:

LOL, he got those talking points from Senapathy? Senapathy has some just plain strange theories about genomics.

Here's Gert Korthof's review of Senapathy's book.

[Lucky Dog]

None of my post was "cut and paste" from any creationist web site.

Did you find something in this statement that was untrue?

I searched on google for Senapathy "If the mutation rate is constant" and found this page: ...

Do you mean to imply that Dr. Senapathy is a creationist? If not, what is your point?

...he got those talking points from Senapathy? Senapathy has some just plain strange theories about genomics.

As my first point, only the questions came from Dr Senapathy's site, all else was mine, including the less than clear wording. My rationale was simple: I had asked others not to cite referrals to other web sites in replying to my post. Consequently, I felt that I should not do so either. Hence, the questions "cut and paste." Nonetheless, I would like to examine the implications of some questions arising your statement:

Are you impugning Dr. Senapathy's credentials? Does his doctorate not come from the correct area? Has he not published enough in his field? Alternately, is it, perhaps, that you merely disagree with his proposed theory? If so, do your credentials entitle you to equal standing in the field in order to do so or are you merely offering questions and/or criticisms you might think are justified? If this is the case, how is your position any different than mine offering questions of "Darwinism?"