Replies

REAL Perot got over 18% of the votes in 1992, when the Clintons might have been stopped.

Yes. And look at the stupid people who could have STOPPED the Clinton's but put their SINGLE AGENDA and their tunnel vision before what was best for the country.

BTW, Perot was NOT a one issue candidate; Tancredo is; and Pat Buchanan is finished, not just as a candidate, but as a person anybody pays any attention to.

"Yes. And look at the stupid people who could have STOPPED the Clinton's but put their SINGLE AGENDA and their tunnel vision before what was best for the country."

Allow me to quote LowCountryJoe "...many Americans cannot stomach market outcomes and, for that matter, have lost their competitive drive." Sounds like you "cannot stomach market outcome" as it applied to the 1992 marketplace of ideas.

"BTW, Perot was NOT a one issue candidate; Tancredo is; and Pat Buchanan is finished, not just as a candidate, but as a person anybody pays any attention to."

All the Bush has to do to defuse this single issue is to follow the will of the electorate and ENFORCE THE LAW, which he swore to do with his hand on a bible. BTW Tancredo supported Dubya for president in the last issue, and to my knowledge did not run on a third party ticket and has not expressed any interest in running for the office. When the GOP sells out it's base it has as much entitlement to conservative votes as an illegal alien has to a drivers license.

Just so you know, I don't think they have a chance either, but I don't want one dime of Republican election funds or one minute of time wasted responding to what the media would surely toss up at every opportunity.

They and the Dems would like nothing better then to have a splinter group that they can give free publicity to, and Perot still has millions he could toss behind anyone he feels like.