It would also be useful to learn what science is: The scientific method, and What's a Scientific Theory?
Send a copy to the Times. They apparently think "how the world got here" is related to the question of evolution. When IDers or Creationists suggest such a link, they get blasted pretty quickly here.
And how is this established? Common traits (which can be ascribed to a Creator); the fossil record (which the article admits is weak even without referring to the Cambrian Explosion); phylogeny (which stems from the crushingly descredited Haeckel); and genetic sequencing which actually makes some sense for the theory although that too has problems. For instance, The comparative mapping data based on the consensus linkage map show a considerable amount of chromosomal conservation retained between man and chicken during evolution. This is in sharp contrast with the comparative mapping data between chicken and mouse, in which the amount of chromosomal conservation is considerably lower.
Now, if God exists (and He does) what's the problem with believing in a Creator who involves Himself in His creation? This is nothing rational about attacking lines of thought that questions the belief that life sprang by chance from a single cell which somehow popped up in violation of biological law.
Physician, heal thyself!