[bilhosty]

Luis I live in from Georgia is that a liberal state? But, . I don't know if the people of Washington are jumping up and down protesting it but they obviously think they have an illegitimate governor. see below

http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/washington_gov_28.htm

McCullough Vs Maryland and the article of the Constitution above showed the right of the federal government too repeal it. Nor does not have to be unconstitutional to repeal it.

You are right I do not like thee laws. They are bad laws and they do not have to be unconstitutional to be repealed. The Dem's control too many legislative bodies to put and end to same day registration and motor voter laws everywhere. Therefore it has to be done by the Congress. And it should be done because it is the right thing to do.
Obviously the lawyer-Democrat party (which I think you are a part of) has no values or decency or commitment to democratic values (no matter what it says). It is just too important to save our system and prevent this kind of thing. This should be fixed immediately. And it should be fixed by what ever means it takes to fix it.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"I don't know if the people of Washington are jumping up and down protesting it but they obviously think they have an illegitimate governor."

we just went through four years of people jumping up and down because they thought that we had an illegitimate President.

Sh$t happens, and the system isn't perfect; you can't expect freedom to be devoid of flaws.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"They are bad laws and they do not have to be unconstitutional to be repealed."

The Washington legislature, the duly elected representatives of the people of the State wrote and enacted these laws in accordance to their State's Constitution.

Now, when the Courts overthrew the Texas anti-sodomy laws, which side where you on?

The side that said that laws duly enacted by the elected representatives of the people in the State of Texas shouldn't be overturned by the Federal government, or where you on the side of the people who said that anti-sodomy laws were bad laws, and in spite of the fact that they were not unconstitutional, they needed to be repealed?

How about Proposition #187 in California?

Where you on the side that wanted the laws approved by the people and passed by the legislature to stand, or the side who said that Proposition #187 was a bad law and needed to be repealed?