We've tried. That was a great motivation for my compiling the List-O-Links. It was also why we included in the "Agreement of the Willing" a provision that "agressive amnesia" was abusive.
But the problem continues, for some or all of these reasons:
1. New freepers showing up, unaware that we've all been there before.So it gets heated, sometimes, as the old-timers grow short of patience. Whatcha gonna do?
2. Some regular freepers maliciously persist in posting the same debunked arguments.
3. Some (new or old) who insist that their interpretation of scripture trumps physical evidence.
Is the "list of links" - or a url to them - always posted when you ping people to science threads? If not, it might be helpful to post a "newcomer's welcome" on your usual ping...
On the list of three causes for revisiting, I only have a recommendation for the third:
However, a big however, it is quite useful to make all such arguments on a theological/philosophy thread. Metaphysical naturalism v. various doctrines of Christianity, etc.
Only thing, only one side considerst them debunked. The other side considers them valid so it will never end.
So it gets heated, sometimes, as the old-timers grow short of patience. Whatcha gonna do?
Even short-timers grow short of patience. I mean how many times on this thread have I heard that "God created the sun on day 4 thus evolution is impossible.
The best one is the "entropy" argument where they post false science and give all these links. Totally bogus but it keeps reappearing.