To: general_re
No, you are asking for the rules of science to be rewritten to suit some other, non-science agenda. If you want science's stamp of approval, you need to play by the rules of science, not stamp your feet and demand that they be changed when you don't like the outcome. Presicely why we have the Intelligent Design movement amongst published, peer-reviewed scientists.
284 posted on
01/29/2005 12:51:41 PM PST by
bondserv
(Sincerity with God is the most powerful instigator for change! † [Check out my profile page])
To: bondserv
Presicely why we have the Intelligent Design movement amongst published, peer-reviewed scientists. Where? Please cite!
287 posted on
01/29/2005 12:53:24 PM PST by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
To: bondserv
Presicely why we have the Intelligent Design movement amongst published, peer-reviewed scientists. Resubmit it to a neutral editor and see how far it goes - let's find out if it got in on its merits, or if it got in because Sternberg wanted it in regardless of its merits.
290 posted on
01/29/2005 12:55:16 PM PST by
general_re
(How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson