[bvw]

"Further, nothing in design implies intelligence. That is the shortcut of the intellectually lazy. Intelligence could lead to design, but the presence of the latter does not necessarily indicate the former."

First -- before I frame my answer. Let me call you a series of highly unflattering and rude names, for I have sensed that is your desire. You sniveling twit, you pompous ass, you canker-infested glob of pus. There, is that staisfactory?

And on to the response ...

* * *

Of course design infers intelligence. That is by its very definition. That is an intrinsic, inseperable part of what the term "design" means.

[WildHorseCrash]

First -- before I frame my answer. Let me call you a series of highly unflattering and rude names, for I have sensed that is your desire. You sniveling twit, you pompous ass, you canker-infested glob of pus. There, is that staisfactory?

Ha ha ha. Whatever gets you off, junior.

Of course design infers intelligence. That is by its very definition. That is an intrinsic, inseperable part of what the term "design" means.

A non-random, yet intelligent action could create design. Look at the evolution of animals or the shapes of galaxies. Both show elements of design, but not intelligence. Snowflakes and ice crystals exhibit design, but, again, no intelligence in creating them.