Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
The first one I did not understand at all. Would you kindly rephrase it?

Thank you. As to the first. There is a website (as soon as I find it I will post it) that has a "detailed" statistical evalution assuming certain parameters as to cell structure and years available, etc. that concludes that the possibility of the number of "random" changes inoder to end with the present "man" is statisticaly too many (very low probability) for the number of years and (wave the hand) evolution is therefore impossible.

1,555 posted on 02/02/2005 12:36:41 PM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1545 | View Replies ]


To: WildTurkey; betty boop
Thank you for your reply!

As to the first. There is a website (as soon as I find it I will post it) that has a "detailed" statistical evalution assuming certain parameters as to cell structure and years available, etc. that concludes that the possibility of the number of "random" changes inoder to end with the present "man" is statisticaly too many (very low probability) for the number of years and (wave the hand) evolution is therefore impossible.

May I suggest that we agree to dismiss out of hand and without comment any sources which are ideologically or theologically biased? That would include answers-in-Genesis, infidels.org and the ilk.

1,576 posted on 02/02/2005 12:51:30 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1555 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson