Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

hysterical Darwinites panic
crosswalk ^ | 2004 | creationist

Posted on 01/28/2005 4:28:41 PM PST by metacognative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,281-2,297 next last
To: general_re
So says the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, in his expert biological opinion. Does he do astrophysics and analytical chemistry too, or does he limit himself to the life sciences?

Most likely he has spoken on the phone with Dr. Meyer. But then again, you are with the Brown Shirts; in one out the other.

"When the Biological Society of Washington issued its embarrassing apology for publishing the paper, the organization pledged that arguments for Intelligent Design 'will not be addressed in future issues of the Proceedings,' regardless of whether the paper passes peer review."

If you say it about one, the saying applies to them all. HaHaHaHa (-: peer-reviewed :-)

"'My conclusion on this,' McDiarmid said, 'was that it was a really bad judgment call on the editor's part.'"

181 posted on 01/29/2005 8:34:13 AM PST by bondserv (Sincerity with God is the most powerful instigator for change! † [Check out my profile page])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

You first reference may have some merit, since you clearly have rocks in your head.

Suggesting that cells constrained in some soup containing Iron Sulphate and Nickle Sulphate "likely" contributed to the "evolution" of those cells into diverse life forms is scientifically STUPID!

There is no mechanism DEMONSTRATING such such cause and effect.

EVERY one of those references contain such phrases of scientific certainty as "likely", "perhaps", "probably", "may", and "could have".

They don't "KNOW" any of this!

There is also a significant amount of peer backslapping, substituting as scientific "proof".


182 posted on 01/29/2005 8:35:19 AM PST by G Larry (Admiral James Woolsey as National Intelligence Director)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan

Explain why.


183 posted on 01/29/2005 8:40:50 AM PST by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: All

I'd like to ask all of you evolutionist to do a little experiment...investigate some of the NDE (Near Death Experience) cases. Especially the one's from little kids.

Since you don't have any problem with believing that we have evolved to get to this point...it shouldn't be a problem to listen to all the folks that have been documented to have died and came back to tell us what they saw. You can think of it as our next step in Evolution.

And if you have a problem with believing NDE's....why?

Here's a Pro & Con link on NDE's to get you started:
http://www.near-death.com/experiences/research08.html

For those of you undecided about what to believe when it comes to believing in Evolution VS Creation.

God told us how we got here...how to live our lives while we're here...where we're going when we die...through the Bible(Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth). God leaves it up to each one of you to decide what you want to believe.


184 posted on 01/29/2005 8:46:49 AM PST by Ready2go
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

...bear false witness ... ?

Witness this:
Creation out of nothing with nothing ?
Sure, why not.


185 posted on 01/29/2005 8:56:24 AM PST by UltraKonservativen (( YOU CAN'T FIX STUPID ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Most likely he has spoken on the phone with Dr. Meyer.

Oh, really? And what do you based that likelihood on? Tea leaves? Goat entrails?

I don't know any such thing, and neither, I suspect, do you. And even if he has, Meyer himself is not exactly a neutral observer, now is he?

But then again, you are with the Brown Shirts; in one out the other.

When your "argument", such as it is, could have been lifted straight from the Code Pink playbook, you should probably take that as a sign that you're wandering off the reservation. "Brown shirts"? And what does that make you, if not an ideological clone of the left, willing to let bad science in because of how it makes you feel, rather than stand up for some sort of standards of scholarship? Touchy-feely, let's let it in regardless of how bad it is because it makes us feel all warm and fuzzy inside - please. Spare me.

Brown shirts, feh. Trust me - you don't want to go down that road, friend.

186 posted on 01/29/2005 9:01:19 AM PST by general_re (How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: metacognative
Leave God out of it, and keep minds open!

But this is the point is it not? Ultimately, the whole of creationism is a political movement to reestablish the dominance of evangelical Christianity as a political force in determining social policy. Otherwise, I can't see the point of it.

187 posted on 01/29/2005 9:03:36 AM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa
Here is their approximate order of composition:

But, But, But ... you mean it is God's word and we don't even know when it was written? And in what order?

188 posted on 01/29/2005 9:13:27 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon

A little bit of "learning" just puts them deeper in the hole. I got him in #137.


189 posted on 01/29/2005 9:15:45 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Junior

I didn't. I told him that there were plenty of good explanations if he were to just get his head out of the creationists' websites.


190 posted on 01/29/2005 9:18:52 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon; momincombatboots

Wow! That's a lot. Too bad there is no one around to help the kid wade through all that.


191 posted on 01/29/2005 9:22:46 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: metacognative
a mystery is better than a wrong answer.

If that were true, we wouldn't have the light bulb ...

192 posted on 01/29/2005 9:24:29 AM PST by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: general_re
Brown shirts, feh. Trust me - you don't want to go down that road, friend.

I backed up my claims with inflammatory quotes from those on your side; and you respond thusly. You may wish to recheck your feeling meter.

The Code Pink playbook doesn't permit straightforward quotes, they are to hard to twist. My point would have been just as powerful with only the quotes and without any comments from me. Always indicting. And yes, the context is easy to apprehend.

193 posted on 01/29/2005 9:36:46 AM PST by bondserv (Sincerity with God is the most powerful instigator for change! † [Check out my profile page])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
[Thunderous applause!]

{But the creationists sit in grim silence, rolling their eyes, like Hillary during a speech by the President.)

194 posted on 01/29/2005 9:39:32 AM PST by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Junior

If you really believe a human cannot be sensibly ranked above a germ...we are disconnected.


195 posted on 01/29/2005 9:41:10 AM PST by metacognative (follow the gravy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: garbanzo

America was a christian creation country for all its' history and did quite well.


196 posted on 01/29/2005 9:43:20 AM PST by metacognative (follow the gravy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: metacognative
Leave God out of it, and keep minds open!

Which do you prefer?

To leave God out of it, or to keep our minds open?

197 posted on 01/29/2005 9:43:43 AM PST by mississippi red-neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildTurkey

You oughta know. You rely on wrong answers.


198 posted on 01/29/2005 9:44:43 AM PST by metacognative (follow the gravy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

You have more in common with Hillary than "creationists" do.....


199 posted on 01/29/2005 9:46:07 AM PST by metacognative (follow the gravy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: metacognative
When the Biological Society of Washington issued its embarrassing apology for publishing the paper, the organization pledged that arguments for Intelligent Design "will not be addressed in future issues of the Proceedings," regardless of whether the paper passes peer review.

The religious hierarchy has spoken.
200 posted on 01/29/2005 9:46:22 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 2,281-2,297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson