Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HappyHere

I've seen it.

I have to say criminal charges seems like a little much.

The film was tasteless, but I'll admit it made me chuckle. And it memorably advanced the point: "Small but tough".

Traditionally, stuff like this is protected speech, as satire, so I don't think they have much to worry about.

The $40,000 price tag of it, though, is, well, a bit extreme. I was shocked someone would shoot a spec ad on film in this day and age.

D


17 posted on 01/28/2005 3:15:35 PM PST by daviddennis (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: daviddennis
The film was tasteless...

Au contraire, it was magnifique !
VW's wadded panties just lost 'em a potential buyer.

19 posted on 01/28/2005 3:33:18 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: daviddennis

I'm still not convinced VW didn't have a hand in making this. I too think it's very odd to make a spec ad of this quality and budget-- spec work is usually a bit more down and dirty. Who would spend 40K pounds on something that is not intended to be seen by only but a handful of potential clients as a "proof of competancy" project?

Doesn't smell right to me. BTW, I'm in the business.


20 posted on 01/28/2005 3:47:37 PM PST by agooga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson