Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: veracious

An M113 is not practical for moving rapidly. It's armor is only thick enough to repel M-16 rounds.


4 posted on 01/28/2005 11:16:02 AM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: writer33; veracious
An M113 is not practical for moving rapidly. It's armor is only thick enough to repel M-16 rounds.

Who would shoot at one with an M-16? I'd want to be protected against an AK-47.

24 posted on 01/28/2005 12:05:36 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson