Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SaltyJoe; Qatar-6

It was a political decision from the “math professor” warriors in OSD. It had to do with image they wanted to project, not safety.
A M113 A3, of which 700+ are already in Kuwait; would have been much better than an unarmed Humvee, and no it’s not slow; an A3 can keep up with an M1, pop the top you have 360 security. With the Cav kit, and the additional armor, especially the Stryker RPG “slat stand off armor”, you have a much more survivable platform than a factory up armored Humvee. A Stryker may be quieter, but they have a huge turning radius, 113’s can neutral steer, a great advantage in urban terrain.

Qatar-6, your thoughts?


28 posted on 01/28/2005 12:31:49 PM PST by AH-1S Pilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: AH-1S Pilot
Exactly.
29 posted on 01/28/2005 12:46:52 PM PST by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: AH-1S Pilot
113’s can neutral steer, a great advantage in urban terrain.

I think you meant to say 'pivot steer' or 'pivot turn'.

31 posted on 01/28/2005 1:01:38 PM PST by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson