Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Russ_in_NC
If this honest judge says that there was fraud and there needs to be a new election, the Dem's will just appeal to the 9th circuit, they'll win there and the SCOUS will refuse to hear the case. Election over. period.

IIRC, the judge hearing the case has heard a similar (county?) case, ordered a revote, and was upheld by the State Supremes.

I'm sure a more-attentive WA FReeper will correct me if I got it wrong.

33 posted on 01/28/2005 12:47:38 PM PST by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Rearden

I never said you were wrong as far as the courts of Washington go. I said you were wrong as far as the ninth circuit goes. From what i have read, the judges in Washington tend to rule for the law and not make it up or ignor it. The 9th circuit on the other hand, live in a fantasy land.

You said they would refuse to hear the case, I believe you are wrong. I believe they will hear the case and rule with the Dem's (unless the Dem's win in the lower courts, then they will refuse to hear the case - which is the same as ruling for the Dem's)


35 posted on 01/28/2005 1:06:23 PM PST by Russ_in_NC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson