[Vicki]

I hope they nail this guy. This has gone on far too long.

[Veto!]

Both Dr. Farrell and Investigator Gelfand call the discovery of mostly heterosexual pornographic magazines significant, because many molesters of young boys use such material to excite and stimulate their prey.

Or heterosexual porn might just get Michael off. I'm not sure I see a clear claim in this article that Jackson had kiddie porn in his place. They come close to saying it, but stop short.

One of those confiscated books withh photos of naked teenage boys was shown on the Today Show or some similar show, and it did not look pornographic unless you consider naked bodies just standing there porn. I don't think the Supreme Court does.

I hope prosecutors are relying on things they're not telling us to make their case.

[wideminded]

Dr. Patricia Farrell, who has worked with pedophiles and their victims, studied the book for Court TV and concluded,

Somehow Court TV obtained a copy of this book and showed some of the images on TV. I was wondering how they obtained it. They said that not all the pictures could be shown. Somene could claim that it was just a bunch of art photographs, but the book was clearly intended to appeal to people with more than just an artistic interest in boys.

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

There was a certain wisdom in the old nuthouses - padded rooms and straitjackets. Maybe California authorities need to look into that.

[HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity]

"Andy! Aaaaaaaaaaandy! We got a live one here!"

[hershey]

Lock Jackson up and throw away the key.