This is Sternberg's version, but even so it supports my statement that the reviewers disagreed with the paper's conclusions. Normally, a paper that is published to stir up controversy would be labeled as such.
Again, the problem with ID is not that it is wrong, but that it can't be proven wrong.
If ID wants respectability, do som research that demonstrates that design is possible. Show how you can predict the effects of an allele change on the individual organism, the species and the ecosystem. After all, "cause and effect" are the mantra of ID.