Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boot Hill
To come up with that 5x number, they first pretended that the current crop of solar cells were 2.5x less efficient than they actually are.

That 5x comparison is against polymer solar cells, which as you mentioned are less efficient than silicon. Although less efficient, the polymer cells are (or will be) cheaper to produce and more flexible. Still, this stuff could be even more efficient than silicon so there is a lot of potential here, especially for portable electronics.

40 posted on 01/28/2005 6:43:35 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (With enemies like Michael Moore, who needs friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Squawk 8888
"That 5x comparison is against polymer solar cells...

If they want to argue efficiency, then they must compare their best to the industries current best. And the current state of the art is the poly-crystalline PV cells which is 2.5x more efficient than the numbers they offered.

--Boot Hill

49 posted on 01/28/2005 6:53:07 AM PST by Boot Hill (How do you verbalize a noun?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson