And yes, that picture is the one of Hill kissing Suha Arafat ( "wife" of The Littlest Terrorist ) after Suha had accused the Israelis of poisoning Palestinian children...
Posted on 01/28/2005 12:22:41 AM PST by kattracks
And yes, that picture is the one of Hill kissing Suha Arafat ( "wife" of The Littlest Terrorist ) after Suha had accused the Israelis of poisoning Palestinian children...
NOPE!
Nevertheless, I'll betcha that in less than a year, 2 out of 3 "people on the street" will assure you that Hilly used to be far right but has moved towards the center in the past year. 1/28/2005,,,mark this date down. The MSM will be patting each other on the back big time.
I think Hillary is a sad, and even tragic choice.
She can try it... but we won't buy it.
What's worse is that many FR regulars will fall for it. It looks like we'll have to make available a special section of FR archived material to remind people what is what here.
>>Still, it would be foolish to laugh off the New Hillary. Political makeovers have succeeded in the past (the New Nixon, the New Wallace), and the Clintons have shown a knack, rare in the Democratic Party, for grabbing symbolic bits of conservatism and weaving them into sheep's clothing. <<
Is this a subtle hint by Charen that the Clinton's are really wolves in sheep's clothing?
Who knew? ; >
Right. Like Chirac in France... he was a Communist, or Mussolin, also a Commie until he saw that it wouldn't work and then he became a fascist.
I personally think that it is a case of "Signal right, turn left."
Oh, yeah. The Demonrats get whacked on "Moral Values" and all of a sudden Hitlary starts "Moving To The Center".
Naah, she doesn't have her filthy finger in the wind. She's really abandoned all the perverted leftist goals to which she dedicated her entire life up until the last election.
Yeah, I believe that.
>>Still, it would be foolish to laugh off the New Hillary. Political makeovers have succeeded in the past <<
I'm confused. Are you attributing this comment to me? I didn't make it .. it's taken from the original post.
I don't buy Hillary's "makeover" one bit. The woman is scary and insidious. Probably more dangerous and devious than Bill.
BTW, did you know she's not an advocate of "abstinence"?
(snort)
Hillary is one of the most calculating and ruthless politicians alive. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Limbaugh did his usual incisive analysis of this earlier this week... the question is whether she can keep the screaming left from bolting, by convincing them that she's "just pretending" in order to get elected. That sort of duplicity *is* a time-honored tradition with leftists, y'know... end justifies the means and all that...
She'll end up having to waffle and equivocate even more than Kerry, though - and that alone will prove her undoing if the Republicans manage to run someone as ideologically committed and decisive as GWB against her.
Hitlery's vote against banning partial birth abortion will hurt her badly.
One of the many reasons Joh Kerry lost is because he had no core beliefs, believed in nothing, and went whichever way the wind was blowing. That is a losing position with everyone.
Oh brother, I better shut down the PC today!
That first comment was unclear!
It wasn't directed at you, it just added to your comment.
It was clear to me that you were not and are not a Hillary Supporter!
When I re-read my post, it looks like I thought you were speaking for the dark side!
;-)
See my post 19... that was directed to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.