Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THIS IS GETTING RIDICULOUS (Michelle Malkin tells of a THIRD Columnist paid by the Administration)
Michelle Malkin's Blog ^ | January 27, 2005 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 01/27/2005 8:08:32 PM PST by Stoat

THIS IS GETTING RIDICULOUS

 

By Michelle Malkin   ·   January 27, 2005 10:03 PM

 

Salon, not exactly my favorite publication, is now reporting that there's a third conservative columnist who took money from the Bush administration without disclosing it. From Eric Boehlert:
And three makes a trend.

One day after President Bush ordered his Cabinet secretaries to stop hiring commentators to help promote administration initiatives, and one day after the second high-profile conservative pundit was found to be on the federal payroll, a third embarrassing hire has emerged. Salon has confirmed that Michael McManus, a marriage advocate whose syndicated column, "Ethics & Religion," appears in 50 newspapers, was hired as a subcontractor by the Department of Health and Human Services to foster a Bush-approved marriage initiative. McManus championed the plan in his columns without disclosing to readers he was being paid to help it succeed.

Responding to the latest revelation, Dr. Wade Horn, assistant secretary for children and families at HHS, announced Thursday that HHS would institute a new policy that forbids the agency from hiring any outside expert or consultant who has any working affiliation with the media. "I needed to draw this bright line," Horn tells Salon. "The policy is being implemented and we're moving forward."

Horn's move came on the heels of Wednesday's report in the Washington Post that HHS had paid syndicated columnist and marriage advocate Maggie Gallagher $21,000 to write brochures and essays and to brief government employees on the president's marriage initiative. Gallagher later wrote in her column that she would have revealed the $21,000 payment to readers had she recalled receiving it.

The Gallagher revelation came just three weeks after USA Today reported that the Education Department, through a contract with the Ketchum public relations firm, paid $240,000 to Armstrong Williams, a conservative African-American print, radio and television pundit, to help promote Bush's No Child Left Behind program to minority audiences.

To date, the Bush administration has paid public relation firms $250 million to help push proposals, according to a report Thursday in USA Today. That's double what the Clinton administration spent on P.R. from 1997 to 2000. Shortly after Williams' contract came to light, the Democrats on the Committee on Government Reform wrote a letter to President Bush demanding that he "immediately provide to us all past and ongoing efforts to engage in covert propaganda, whether through contracts with commentators, the distribution of video news releases, or other means." As of Thursday, a staffer on the committee told Salon, there had been no response.

Horn says McManus, who could not be reached for comment, was paid approximately $10,000 for his work as a subcontractor to the Lewin Group, a health care consultancy hired by HHS to implement the Community Healthy Marriage Initiative, which encourages communities to combat divorce through education and counseling. McManus provided training during two-day conferences in Chattanooga, Tenn., and also made presentations at HHS-sponsored conferences. His syndicated column has appeared in such papers as the Washington Times, the Dallas Morning News and the Charlotte Observer...

 

Triple-crikey. I wonder if McManus will say he "forgot" about the $10,000 payment, too. That line seems to be working pretty well now among some of my fellow conservatives. I'll have more to say about all this in the morning, but for now, let me just say that if I accepted $10,000 or $20,000 or $40,000 in taxpayer funds for my writing, I wouldn't forget it in one year or 5 years or 10 years. And I'd make damn sure I disclosed it in relevant columns, books, or media appearances, even if it invited condescension from the "don't be such a holier-than-thou-goody-two-shoes-must-you-disclose-everything?" crowd.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: malkin; mcmanus; michaelmcmanus; michellemalkin; moneywhores; paidshills
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last
To: usmcobra

If only three people were paid for the President's PR, then they must have been the three best people available.
It is probably pretty difficult to find a good PR person who has conservative leanings. And somebody still finds something to complain about. The left is so intent on silencing conservatives there is absolutely nothing a conservative can say or do that is not treated with repression.
The spreading of the wealth (3 people vs: thousands) is this; If the three people succeed in promoting the agenda, (say social Security reform)then thousands, I should say, millions of people will potentially benefit. WE don't have to all realize immediate profit to ultimately share the wealth.

We are in very different times than the times of FDR, that you brought up as comparison. But presenting the truth is still a virtue of a good President. As long as President Bush accomplishes that, I still have no problem.


61 posted on 01/28/2005 10:25:54 PM PST by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mowkeka
You know what this is going to be right? This will turn into the "major second term scandal" that everyone keeps talking about.

If this is the best that the Left can do, I say let them go ahead and knock themselves out with it.  The only thing that it will accomplish is reinforcing what thoughtful people know already....that being that the Dems/Left/MSM have NOTHING in the way of a vision for their party or any form of positive message for the future of the country.  All they have is name-calling, character assassination, juvenile hysteria and making mountains out of molehills.  Zell had it right of course....they're a national party no more.

62 posted on 01/28/2005 10:39:16 PM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Oh, this wasn't even public relations, the second two were experts that were hired for a specific purpose, not to promote policy in the media. The Democrats are trying to pull a fast one like they did with campaign financing.


63 posted on 01/28/2005 10:46:37 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KingNo155

I don't care which party it is, I don't like it. I support the president and most of his decisions, but I will not try to rationalize something that we would be crying "Big Brother" about if it were the other party. He can use the bully pulpit to get his message across, like Reagan and Clinton did.


64 posted on 01/29/2005 8:51:41 AM PST by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson