[Once-Ler]

You said, "Representatives are suppose to act in the interests of their constituents" as a defense of Bush signing CFR. So was he acting in the best interests of the people?

I did not say Dubya acted in the best interest of the people. I said he did what the people demanded. I further stated that the people don't always know what is in their best interest but the alternative to doing what the people want it do is totalitarianism.

I have answered all of your question in my last post to you. You do not like the answers and are asking the same questions. Read the post before responding next time.

[radicalamericannationalist]

"I said he did what the people demanded. I further stated that the people don't always know what is in their best interest but the alternative to doing what the people want it do is totalitarianism."

Again, you equate the veto to a dictatorship. It is not.