To: zarf
It IS a scandal. How can anyone say otherwise? PEOPLE MUST BE FIRED OVER THIS.
5 posted on
01/27/2005 6:19:29 PM PST by
ambrose
(.)
To: ambrose
I agree - it is a scandal. Why did the columnists do it? Easy - money to push what they already believe in.
Why did the government do it? That's the question. Some real bonehead plays here.
7 posted on
01/27/2005 6:22:00 PM PST by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: ambrose
It IS a scandal. I really am a lot more upset about the vote fraud in Wash. & Wisc.
12 posted on
01/27/2005 6:26:41 PM PST by
Tribune7
To: ambrose; zarf
21 posted on
01/27/2005 6:37:04 PM PST by
APRPEH
(no one paid for this opinion)
To: ambrose
Bull. This one is likely as bogus as the Gallagher (sp?) case. She was hired as an expert, not paid to promote. All they have is the Armstrong case. What they do not have are liars making up stories (NYTIMES) or partisans forging documents for stories the "believe" to be otherwise true. Nor do they have lame excuses like the pressure to be first made them do it, even though it was a story they'd been working on for FIVE years.
The gov't hires contract labor from experts all the time. There is no scandal in that.
22 posted on
01/27/2005 6:37:11 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: ambrose
PEOPLE MUST BE FIRED OVER THIS. In this administration? Are you kidding? They'll get promotions, or at minimum, shiny medals pinned on their chests.
35 posted on
01/27/2005 7:00:20 PM PST by
Huck
(I only type LOL when I'm really LOL.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson