To: ambrose
So if the shoe was on the other foot, and it was a Democratic president paying columnists to push "gay marriage," that would be OK too.
10 posted on
01/27/2005 6:25:19 PM PST by
valkyrieanne
(card-carrying South Park Republican)
To: valkyrieanne
So if the shoe was on the other foot, and it was a Democratic president paying columnists to push "gay marriage," that would be OK too. The way it seemed to mostly work was Big Media hiring pols who they knew supported "gay marriage" at wages higher than government scale.
The point is nobody is paying anybody to "push" these things. The columnists were pushing these things on their own. The money was a subsidy.
16 posted on
01/27/2005 6:34:10 PM PST by
Tribune7
To: valkyrieanne
28 posted on
01/27/2005 6:46:35 PM PST by
Paladin2
(SeeBS News - We Decide, We Create, We Report - In that order! - ABC - Already Been Caught)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson