Posted on 01/27/2005 5:48:34 PM PST by Pikamax
So funny .
Not necessarily. As the old saying goes, never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. In this case, it's mostly "further proof" of the well-known observation that ability or genius in one field doesn't necessarily mean that you know jack s**t in another area.
So he never actually gave them $1 billion, did he?
Seems like his phony-balony wife (Fonda) welched out on some deal similar to that too.
Are some of these the "experts" that also said Clinton did nothing wrong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.