Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush To Take Social Security Debate To American People
mens news daily ^ | January 27, 2005 | Jeff Gannon

Posted on 01/27/2005 4:00:07 PM PST by demlosers

Talon News

President Bush announced Wednesday that he would take his case for Social Security reform directly to the American people following his State of the Union address on February 2. At a press conference, the president reiterated his intention save the retirement system from its eventual bankruptcy if changes aren't made in the short term.

In an opening statement, Bush said that in asking the Congress to act, he would be open to a vigorous discussion but that any solution "must confront the problem fully and directly by making the system permanently solvent and providing the option of personal accounts."

He pressed his case to the press corps, pointing out that it is a matter of math that the system will go "into the red" in 13 years, paying out more in benefits that it collects beginning in 2018. Without changes, the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted in 2042.

Despite the political difficulties, Bush adamantly said, "Now is the time to act."

He pointed out that for several decades, Social Security was the 'third rail' of American politics. But he also pointed out that his reelection gave him a mandate to deal with the issue since it was a central part of his campaign.

The president acknowledged opposition from Democrats and resistance within his own party, but he pronounced himself ready to lead the Congress and take the case to the American people. He noted that his predecessor, Democrat Bill Clinton, made a similar tour of the United States talking about saving Social Security.

Bush expressed an understanding of the power of those wanting to derail a Social Security agenda by "scaring people." He recognized that it has been a tactic employed by those who believe the status quo is acceptable.

The president was clear about reassuring seniors at or near retirement age that they would see no changes in their benefits. He promised that he would remind today's seniors, "we have a duty to act on behalf of their children and grandchildren."

While he welcomed a broad discussion of options for reform, he flatly ruled out an increase in the payroll tax. He also rejected a rollback of the historic income tax cuts achieved during his first term.

Opponents of reform cite estimates of $1 to $2 trillion in transition costs to include personal savings accounts. The president refused to comment on how those costs would be covered, but indicated that the unfunded liability is over $10 trillion and grows larger with inactivity.

In speaking about personal accounts he stressed they are part of the "ownership society" that he is promoting. People will be able to own and manage their assets and pass earnings to beneficiaries.

The president met with members of the Senate on Tuesday to open discussions and followed that up with a similar conference Wednesday with House members. He pledged to work with both Republicans as well as Democrats to find the solution.

Senate Democrats are fiercely opposed to Social Security reform as well as the balance of the Bush agenda. Republicans had been hoping that the obstructionist tactics in the Senate would have been diminished with the ouster in November of Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD). But his successor, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), presides over what many see as a smaller and more radicalized caucus.

On Monday, when Reid and other leaders of the Democratic minority laid out their agenda, they painted a bleak picture of the U.S. economy. Comparisons to the Great Depression were a theme of the Kerry campaign, despite significant evidence to the contrary. Last weekend, Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) said that the U.S. economy was on the "brink of collapse." But both claim that Social Security is "rock solid."

Talon News asked President Bush how he would deal with those leaders who hold such disparate views from his own. His simple answer indicated an approach that he attributed to President Clinton, but was done most effectively by Ronald Reagan. The 40th president achieved significant legislative victories by appealing directly to the citizenry.

Moreover, the president's strategy will bypass the Washington media that he once accused of "filtering" his message. Bush said that he would travel to four or five states on his tour and will probably grant interviews to regional news organizations as he has in the past.

He also rejected the pessimism of Senate Democrats when he told Talon News, "I think most people are optimistic about the economy next year. It's very important that we continue to put pro-growth policies in place."

Bush continued, "In terms of whether the economy is growing or not, the jobs are increasing, the forecast looks strong. Obviously, there are some things we need to do to make sure that America is a good place to continue to risk capital and invest. That's why I'm urging the Congress to pass legal reform."

He reiterated that his agenda included legal reform, asbestos reform, class-action reform, and medical liability reform. Bush pointed out that the country was still without an energy bill, the last attempt dying in the Senate last year after Democrats filibustered the legislation.

He explained his philosophy in tackling difficult issues, saying, "You know, we're all here to serve the people. And as I say, I'm going to go out and explain why I think it's important for us to address big issues, like Social Security reform; and take my case to the people and let them hear the rationale about why even address big issues, much less the reason why I think, for example, in Social Security there is an issue."

TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; reform; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2005 4:00:07 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: demlosers

We already know the young adults are in favor of
having their own private accounts. Seniors who
are guaranteed their monthly allotments shouldn't
have a thing to say about the plan. Any 35-45
year old should also be interested in participating
at least part of the deduction. Personally, I see no
negatives to this plan. I'd have bought into it
when I was young. Instead, I had to pay SS PLUS
set aside part of my income for retirement. I did
it, and so did a lot of other people. SS just helps
pay the utilities. Any idiot who ever thought he
could quit working at 62-65 and live on SS was mentally
akilter! But then, there are quite a few seniors
working at Walmart and the Jewel Stores.

3 posted on 01/27/2005 4:12:35 PM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Did my own calculation. Thanks to Social Security, I can expect to live in poverty when I'm 65, instead of being a millionaire had I been able to invest those funds in a private account.

4 posted on 01/27/2005 4:18:36 PM PST by My2Cents ("I look to two things: First to God and then to Fox News.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
If the American people weren't so preoccupied with failure they would realize that if President Bush plan, in the future, was not working, do you think that the SS would have no funds. How stupid. NEVER WILL IT NOT HAVE FUNDS. In this event of failure then taxes will be increased or if enough revenue in the general fund is available, a bail out would occur. IT WOULD BE STUPID TO THINK ANY OTHER OPTION WOULD OCCUR. Please stop the stupidity.
5 posted on 01/27/2005 4:31:25 PM PST by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Ah, the one that asked the President how he could work with people like Clinton that were divorced from reality. LOL

Thank you Jeff!

6 posted on 01/27/2005 4:33:45 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
Ah, the one that asked the President how he could work with people like Clinton that were divorced from reality. LOL

Mr Gannon is 'feeling the love' from his new found friends:

"I guess I've really made the big time! The Media Matters piece has produced a huge spike in my hate mail. I am pleased to share what these lovers of free speech and diversity say to people who have a different viewpoint. FEELING THE LOVE..."

And other news and comments from him at

7 posted on 01/27/2005 4:47:05 PM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Smart move. If the American people don't demand action, nothing will happen.

8 posted on 01/27/2005 4:49:11 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9

Would the new social security program Bush is proposing negate the need to save for retirement outside of social security? I thought it was something like 2-4% of social security deductions that would be available for private investment.

9 posted on 01/27/2005 4:52:33 PM PST by rage24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
"...must confront the problem fully and directly..."

Maybe we could get him to do that with the Mexican border crisis?

10 posted on 01/27/2005 4:52:47 PM PST by Ed_in_NJ (Who killed Suzanne Coleman?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grendel9
Personally, I see no negatives to this plan.

Taking workers money out of the SS system will create huge deficits, will it not?

You see no negatives to billions and billions more deficit spending on top of what we have already?

Or does the President intend to cut SS benefits to make up for it?

Just asking...

11 posted on 01/27/2005 4:59:49 PM PST by Walkin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

Taking it directly to the American people is a smart move. That's what Reagan did.

12 posted on 01/27/2005 5:02:10 PM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
I am glad to see this initiative on the part of the president.

If he can indeed do anything to salvage the current Ponzi mess inherited from our greatest domestic disaster of a president, President Franklin Roosevelt, that will indeed be a blessing for our posterity.

13 posted on 01/27/2005 5:03:01 PM PST by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

The Demand should have been for TRUE TAX REFORM FIRST!
Logically if there had been true tax reform first it would have affected the way SS taxes were collected.

But we are all being distracted by SS reform first when we all wanted a true tax reform FIRST!! Nothing more than distracting us so we forget about taxes. With April fast approaching I would like to have a tax reform package because after this expensive SS reform package there wont be any money left for tax reform.

Plus after the Medicare "fix" that is a disaster can we afford another such disaster with SS now?

14 posted on 01/27/2005 5:21:39 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stopem

You're against everything. Nobody listens to you.

15 posted on 01/27/2005 5:23:50 PM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker

Thank you for that comment.

16 posted on 01/27/2005 5:25:13 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

When targeted for attack, Gannon shows he scored a hit.

It was nice to see a conservative direct a hit at Dems, vs. the usual Libs' mantra of asking the President to apologize for every ill conceived. The Press core probably felt they'd been invaded. Cameron joining its ranks and Gannon sneaking into the building. lol

17 posted on 01/27/2005 5:25:37 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: stopem

Stop 'Em! Please! LOL!

18 posted on 01/27/2005 5:30:06 PM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservativebabe
It is a smart move but I would rather be hearing about securing our borders first and then have the social security debate. First things first.
19 posted on 01/27/2005 5:34:34 PM PST by rodguy911 (rodguy911:First Let's get rid of the UN and the ACLU,..toss in CAIR as well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Walkin Man

Congress spends every penny now. There are increasing surpluses for them through 2009. Then the gravy starts to dry up. Disposable money starts to fall each year after having increased for many years. Congress will twitch and scream like stuck pigs.

The money will go into investments which inevitably will help grow the economy. This in turn will lead to greater greater government revnues over time. Any time the money is kept from the clutches of congress the country is better off!

20 posted on 01/27/2005 5:37:53 PM PST by BillM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson