Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody

What about a doubting Thomas? I know of specific examples that refute your third point, though in large measure you are right.

The Shroud is not meaningless.

Dan


296 posted on 01/28/2005 9:13:01 AM PST by shroudie (http://www.shroudstory.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies ]


To: shroudie
"What about a doubting Thomas?"

Different things. Thomas was looking right at Jesus, someone he had walked with for three years. I don't see how that compares to the every day unbeliever.

" The Shroud is not meaningless."

If you think the shroud is going to convert unbelievers, then you would not only have to prove to them that the shroud came from the correct timeframe, but that it was, indeed, the shroud of Jesus, AND that the interesting markings were caused by the resurrection.

Remember, we're talking unbelievers here.

Good luck with that.

344 posted on 01/31/2005 8:39:17 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson