Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shi'ite leader sees no civil war
swissinfo ^ | January 22, 2005 | Mariam Karouny

Posted on 01/26/2005 2:39:30 PM PST by swilhelm73

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The leading candidate in a Shi'ite alliance expected to dominate Iraq's January 30 elections says that majority Shi'ites will not be dragged into a civil war despite a series of bloody attacks on them.

Abdel Aziz al-Hakim, leader of the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, told Reuters in an interview on Saturday that al Qaeda operative Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was leading a campaign to try to divide Shi'ites and Sunnis but would not succeed.

"We are strongly standing in the face of this evil plan and any sectarian sedition," Hakim said.

Hakim survived an assassination last month -- a suicide bomb attack on his party's headquarters which for Zarqawi's group claimed responsibility. Hakim became SCIRI leader after his brother Mohammed Baqer was killed by a suicide bomb outside Shi'ite Islam's holiest shrine in the city of Najaf in 2003.

In the latest attacks on Shi'ites, a suicide bomb at a wedding party south of Baghdad killed at least 11 people and a blast at a Shi'ite mosque in the capital killed 14 on Friday.

Hakim said these were all attempts to spark civil war.

"It began with assassinating Mohammed Baqer al-Hakim and it is continuing now with the attacks yesterday on a Shi'ite mosque and on the Shi'ite wedding," Hakim said.

Many Sunni Arabs, who made up the backbone of the ruling class under Saddam Hussein, are boycotting Iraq's first multi-party elections in half a century because of a raging Sunni insurgency they say will make a fair vote impossible.

HAKIM SAYS SUNNIS NOT LEFT OUT

But Hakim said it was not true that Sunnis were being left out, adding that 54 of the 111 candidate lists competing in the election are Sunni lists, and there are some Sunni candidates in most lists.

"I think the Sunnis are taking part -- and strongly -- in the elections," he said. He expected more than 50 percent of eligible voters to take part in the elections.

Iraq's main Sunni party, the Iraqi Islamic Party, has withdrawn from the polls, saying they should be delayed.

Sunni Arabs, who make up 20 percent of Iraq's population, fear the elections will bring to power a Shi'ite government with close ties to fellow Shi'ite neighbour Iran, with which Saddam fought an eight-year war.

Sunnis have demanded an improvement in the security situation and a timetable for foreign troops to leave Iraq as a condition for taking part in the polls.

Hakim, who strongly opposes postponing the elections, said holding the polls was the best way to hasten the departure of foreign troops from Iraq.

"We don't see how postponing the elections would help or add anything. We respect the views of all Iraqis but we believe having the elections is the best way to quicken the withdrawal of the foreign forces," he said.

"Through elections we bring a strong government that has the capability of making decisions in the name of Iraqi people, but there is no logic in postponing the elections until a timetable for the withdrawal is set," he added.


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abdelazizalhakim

1 posted on 01/26/2005 2:39:30 PM PST by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Shssssshhhhhh......Don't tell the liberals, they are all hoping that civil war breaks out post haste.......


2 posted on 01/26/2005 2:40:41 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NorCalRepub

Its good to know the Shiites have more faith in their future than democrat congressmen and the US MSM.


3 posted on 01/26/2005 2:42:51 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Sometimes I think the Shiites are simply biding their time 'til coalition forces leave...and then they're gonna open an enormous can of whoop-ass on the Sunnis for all the injustices done to them.


4 posted on 01/26/2005 2:47:57 PM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Frankly, this Sistani fellow has been almost jaw-droppingly rational. I'm surprised. At first, at the conclusion of the invasion, everyone thought he'd be the big problem because he has ties to Iran. Now it seems, he's preaching restraint, supports democracy, hasn't been flame-baiting the US, and even seems to support a secular government with female MP's. That's quite a long way off from being a radical.


5 posted on 01/26/2005 2:50:08 PM PST by Trippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

"Abdel Aziz al-Hakim"

Get a rope.


6 posted on 01/26/2005 2:51:09 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Indeed, I would imagine that as the WoT within Iraq becomes ever more an Iraqi operation and ever less an American one that the politically correct strictures our troops fight under will become less of a restraint to the effort as a whole.


7 posted on 01/26/2005 3:17:57 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

So the Sunni's tried to assassinate him, they have declared a multi-year war, but this guys says there is no civil war. Has someone asked the Sunnis?


8 posted on 01/26/2005 3:20:27 PM PST by Ranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson