Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan; Stone Mountain

Well, if you two are of the mind that rude insults are not actionable, then you are simply advocating a social breakdown. It is not then of consequence where exactly blasphemy fits in the category of rude insults.

You do not understand whart freedom of speech is, or what rights the first Amendment protects. It is really off-topic here, but, again, censorship was a part of American system when there still was a constitution in effect, and so were local decency laws. Despite that, this country had real political debate and real culture, right till the liberals got they grubby hands on the courts.


666 posted on 01/27/2005 1:11:22 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]


To: annalex
Well, if you two are of the mind that rude insults are not actionable, then you are simply advocating a social breakdown.

No, I feel there should be social penalties for acting obnoxiously. I just don't feel that our government should be getting involved in matters such as what is obnoxious or what is blasphemous.
669 posted on 01/27/2005 1:16:04 PM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson