The Constitution forbids judges from interfering and determining religious matters.
There is Canon law that is capable of addressing blasphemy, and there are experts from the realm of the church that can testify in front of a secular judge.
Irrelevant. The laws of a particular religion cannot be Consitutionally enforced by a judge.
I agree that this society is sick and no rational lawmaking is possible in it.
Nonsense. Our system works just fine.
I am yet to see a Christian interest upheld in any measure by today's courts.
What exactly is a "Christian interest" and when have the courts struck them down?
Where? Your paraphrase of the issue is noted: at issue here is not "religious matters" in general but a tort of indecent behavior.
What exactly is a "Christian interest" and when have the courts struck them down?
Christian monuments have been removed from public places or their construction blocked by court decree on numerous occasions and Christian celebrations were denied or curtailed by municipalities, and the crackdowns on religious expression were held up by the imbecile courts. I am sure you can think of specific examples.