Skip to comments.
Court leans on McD's in fat suit
New York Daily News ^
| 1/26/05
| LEO STANDORA
Posted on 01/26/2005 2:25:13 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
To: kattracks
"....Samuel Hirsch's contention that McDonald's violated the New York Consumer Protection Act was worthy of "inspection" by the court."
Yes, the same "inspection" given a used piece of toilet paper!
41
posted on
01/26/2005 7:31:24 AM PST
by
SwinneySwitch
(America, bless God.)
To: grania
Nobody "has" to choose McDonalds. Go to the store, buy groceries and make a dang sandwich. This lazy-ass nonsense coming from these spoiled brats (where are the parents regulating their diet?) who eat and don't exercise, and then blame a restaurant?? We all know that is plain old stupid, and this case should have been thrown out and the lawyers fined for bad advice to clients and filing a frivolous suit.
42
posted on
01/26/2005 12:28:38 PM PST
by
visualops
(When the Going Gets Tough, The Tough Use Duct Tape.)
To: visualops
(where are the parents regulating their diet?You might be on to something here. If they're adults, it might make more sense to sue their parents.
Or, heaven forbid, take responsibility for their own bodies.
43
posted on
01/26/2005 1:08:36 PM PST
by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson