"Perhaps they were beheaded as has been suggested on another thread http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1327136/posts; perhaps Christian items were destroyed; perhaps the women were molested. "
????
Perhaps their blood was drained and there was a pentacle drawn on the floor with a dead cat.
Perhaps they were replaced by dummies and they are living in a witness relocation program in Tacoma ?
Terrorist organisations don't terrorize by making people speculate on what happened.
... " the dog barking is suspicious.... but there was no dog barking, Holmes... that is what is suspicious about it, my dear Watson...."
The possibility of "destroyed" Christian artifacts was brought up by another poster, and the other items were merely illustrative, to relate to my next sentence
If any of these conjectures got "out" it would inflame community passions more, true or not, because of the animosity that already exists;
Terrorist organisations don't terrorize by making people speculate on what happened
Generally, no, but speculation on the "unknown" can create as much terror as the actual act; TERROR is the key and sometimes it is the imagination that makes the Terror more Terrifying...do you know what I mean?
There is no terror in a bang, only in the anticipation of it. Alfred Hitchcock
I realize that all subtlety has been lost on most of these "Neo-Islamofascists" who are more sadistic than idealistic