[ohioWfan]

In any case it is a heinous accusation to anyone on this board who rejects what is put forth by sciencists as infallible rather than reject the word of God which IS infallible, as in any way, shape or form related to an evil, hideous monster who most likely has no faith at all.

And those who defend doing so, are beyond despicable.

Enough of this garbage. I came here for a discussion, not to argue with insanity......

[ml1954]

I'd say you try to make sure you give more than you perceive you get, especially in the condemnation department, while at the same time playing victim.

I detect a bit of moral vanity and hypocrisy in this.

[Modernman]

In any case it is a heinous accusation to anyone on this board who rejects what is put forth by sciencists as infallible rather than reject the word of God which IS infallible, as in any way, shape or form related to an evil, hideous monster who most likely has no faith at all.

You make my point for me. Bin Laden makes his decisions based on his personal belief that the Koran is infallible and that, therefore, anything that conflicts with it can be ignored.

You do the same thing, when it comes to the Bible. That does not make you a monster like OBL, it just means that you follow the same decision-making process as OBL when deciding whether or not to accept certain evidence.

[narby]

reject the word of God which IS infallible

I submit that you, being human, can be fallible in your interpretation of Gods Word.

I also submit that Gods Word and Gods Creation can not conflict. Only human interpretations of the Creation vs the Word can conflict.

See my tagline for what I think God really did.

[Doctor Stochastic]

You have no trouble with those that accuse scientists as being responsible for sexual promiscuity, homesexuality, naziism, communism, halitosis and wearing stripes with plaid though. Your silence must mean endorsement.