You've stooped to making personal observations because you can't refute the plain words I use to explain the plain words of our Constitution.
Indeed, those words mean what they say, in the context of the day & the men that wrote them.
You say the founders never intended that the 1st amendment should apply to states, - that State religions are OK.
I say the founders got what they intended in religious freedom. - We have a union of States where religion is kept out of government, and no religious test is required to hold office.
I'm just trying to understand you. If you were a liberal, it would explain your logic because liberals don't believe in absolute truth. They think there is such a thing as "your truth" and "my truth". They think they can change the meaning of words to fit their argument and thereby change the truth.