Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
Somehow to him, that is failure.

I think the point of the General's complaint is that we do not have enough infantry troops. I would agree. We are placing a heavy burden on a relatively small number of troops. WIthout an increase in infantry troops the stateside rotations will need to be increased, and at the same time, the period for unit refitting and training will be shortened, all of which is an unfair burden placed squarely on the shoulders of the infantryman.

61 posted on 01/25/2005 2:28:55 PM PST by semaj ("....by their fruit you will know them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: semaj
I think the point of the General's complaint is that we do not have enough infantry troops. I would agree.

I agree also. However, if you have more infantry troops, the ratio of infantry troops killed to non-infantry troops killed still would not change - which is why I can't understand his approach to this issue. I think a better approach is to look at whether we are burning out our combat troops because we have to rotate them over longer periods.

64 posted on 01/25/2005 2:34:38 PM PST by dirtboy (To make a pearl, you must first irritate an oyster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson