1 posted on
01/24/2005 10:01:53 PM PST by
paltz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: paltz
Based entirely on the assumption that the kids are going to be totally honest in their answers.
3 posted on
01/24/2005 10:04:54 PM PST by
Kirkwood
To: paltz
6-Degrees of Kevin Bacon by academia
4 posted on
01/24/2005 10:05:57 PM PST by
stainlessbanner
(Southern powder and Southern steel)
To: paltz
Your tax dollars at work. This sounds less like research than it does an episode of a WB drama.
To: paltz
Fascinating article. One thought I had on reading it though was wondering to what degree all these high school students were truthful about their sexual exploits. To a first approximation (and I could be way off here) I would expect the boys to "pad" their resume and perhaps the girls to underreport same. But then again, who knows these days?
To: paltz
Oh for goodness sakes! This is pathetic! Not only are your kids being handed condoms at school, but now their "mating habits" are being studied like rats in a cage. Whoever headed this study should be sent to Philadelphia with "Go PATS" tatooed on their forehead.
To: paltz
The researchers used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health.
Let me get this straight: my tax dollars can go to support some useless research by some brainiacs yet the cure to stop rampant sexual disease spreading in high schools, Bible study, is banned? I'm so tired of the liberals and their buddies in the MSM.
To: paltz
It is disgusting that high school kids even have networks of sexual relations. Eighty years ago this was not the case: some of the boys might have lost their virginity but the vast majority of girls had not. And are we, as a result of the change, happier as a society? I don't think so. The carefully nonjudgemental manner in which the article is written, cleansed of any moral reference, gives tacit approval to all this. And then we are surprised at the epidemic of abortions and STDs.
10 posted on
01/24/2005 10:19:44 PM PST by
Capriole
(the Luddite hypocritically clicking away on her computer)
To: paltz
In highschool I was highly networked...with my left hand. ;-)
13 posted on
01/24/2005 10:22:22 PM PST by
Avenger
To: paltz
14 posted on
01/24/2005 10:22:56 PM PST by
Plutarch
To: paltz
(See figure for a representation of the network.)![](http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/Adolescent%20romantic%20networkA.jpg)
No wonder I didn't get any in High School...
16 posted on
01/24/2005 10:25:00 PM PST by
Drango
(To Serve Man.....IT'S A COOKBOOK!)
To: paltz
This will lead to micro managing high school relationships. I'm sure the wackos will find a 'good use' for this study but damn, is there anything sacred anymore ?
17 posted on
01/24/2005 10:25:42 PM PST by
John Lenin
(You have to be a lunatic yourself to appeal to the RAT base)
To: paltz
The figure:
![](http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/Adolescent%20romantic%20networkA.jpg)
18 posted on
01/24/2005 10:26:05 PM PST by
null and void
(Let there be dancing in the streets, drinking in the saloons and necking in the park!)
To: paltz
Hell, all this time, and I thought kids went to school to learn Math, Reading, and Government.
No wonder there is a dumming down of Americans.
24 posted on
01/24/2005 10:29:37 PM PST by
standing united
(The second amendment does not stand for the right to hunt, but to over throw a corrupt Gov.)
To: paltz
Reason #3,758 to Homeschool your kids.
70 posted on
01/24/2005 10:51:09 PM PST by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: paltz
I cannot believe that someone got paid to make a F$%K tree diagram of a school. Forgive the vulgarity, but that's what we used to call it on IRC.
85 posted on
01/24/2005 11:28:14 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(Nations do not survive by setting examples for others. Nations survive by making examples of others)
To: paltz
Students were asked to identify their sexual and romantic partners in the past 18 months from a roster of other students attending their school.
It is hard for me to believe that students would be willing to provide this information in a truthful manner.
To: paltz
Yet another humiliation for the Chess Club.
94 posted on
01/25/2005 12:06:33 AM PST by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: paltz
One might wonder how the teens in the survey have much time and attention for their studies, sports, music, and family, for all the energy and, certainly, worry, that goes along with this choice.
96 posted on
01/25/2005 12:09:44 AM PST by
GretchenM
(It remains to be seen what God will do through a person who gives Him all the glory.)
To: paltz
Well, I'm happy to see that at least there weren't any purple dots to represent transexual or transgender students. A big 0% is a good thing there!! LOL
98 posted on
01/25/2005 12:46:22 AM PST by
Jammz
("The only thing needed for evil to prevail, is for good men to do nothing.")
To: paltz
Wasn't this done once before? I'm pretty sure that it was... SNL, with Peter Fonda.
101 posted on
01/25/2005 1:08:25 AM PST by
Redcloak
(No, I haven't been drinking.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson