"Maybe if you and others tried to understand that the roots of the alleged Bigotry come from the hearts of MANY people who have been adversely affected by the actions of the Islamofascists, and that they have a right to be angry at all Muslims, but it is all talk, they are not going to act on it."
Since Islamofascists are not ALL muslims, as you have rightly identified, I believe you've given the definition of bigotry.
As for free speech, I suppose your friends have informed you, that FR has posting rules and it is not a democracy.
If not, please go to the home page and check out the rules.
So you're saying that the 1st amendment is not applicable here? How about identifying the quotes you posted? (name of poster and where it's from).
From the guidlines: Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.
I guess we need to define "Racism". Last I looked there were three main races, with subgroups for each: Caucasian, Negroid and Mongoloid. Saying something against Islam is not racist, it may be intolerant, but not racist.
I'll ask you what I asked CG: Do the jews have a right to be mad at all Germans for the Holocaust?
Do the Chinese have the right to be mad at all Japanese for the Rape of Nanking and other war crimes?
Do Americans that lost loved ones at Pearl Harbor have the right to hate the Japanese?
Do the Palestinians have the right to hate ALL jews for the actions of the Israelis? and so on...