Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevkrom

You are partailly correct. I happen to think that governemnt does way more than what it should be doing. If these people are not performing a task that can't be done by non-government workers they are essential (Cops, firefighters, judges, state attorneys etc.) On the other hand DOT, Social workers, food stamp coordinators etc. Should go find real work somewhere else where I can choose not to support them by shopping elsewhere


8 posted on 01/24/2005 9:30:11 AM PST by bibarnes (My mamma was a human, my poppa was a human therefore I am a human)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: bibarnes
You are partailly correct.

No, I'm 100% correct. I readily agree that many government employees are useless, but you are still reading way too much into the phrase "non-essential". Using your examples of "good" government employees, a judge or state attorney is non-essential by the government definition because if their workload is put off for a day or two because of a winter storm or other problem, it's no big deal. However, at least some subset of cops and firefighters have to be on duty during the same situation, and therefore are essential.

Anyone who would normally be in a crisis-management position (such as 24/7 on-call) is "essential", everyone else is "non-essential", regardless of the value added by their position.

12 posted on 01/24/2005 9:35:39 AM PST by kevkrom (If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson