Sad, isn't it. Maybe judges should have read the BILL OF RIGHTS berfore making that decision.
As long as the view on abortion is the primary qualification for nominating a jutice, we are going to continue to get crazy rulings like this.
In the wildest hypothetical situation, if a psychic were able to concentrate on a crime and determine who the perp was, would you feel him doing so would be unconstitutional. (the exercise of his own talents). Is the same true if they could block terrorist activities that way?