'So it is all peachy keen as long as the SCOTUS goes about redefining plain English?'
I can't answer that question adequately without knowing what 'plain English' word(s) you think the Court is redefining. I've already pointed out that they _don't_ redefine 'search' to exclude dog sniffs (and I wouldn't think it was all right if they did). What did you have in mind here?
So a dog sniffing your car for a particular oder it has been trained to identify is NOT a seach. In what alternate Universe?