Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz; All

I would urge every one on FR to consider doing the ride along with police. I suspect there is more to this case than just a "nervous" driver. (Dare I say profile?)

It has long been the case law to allow for the calling of a police dog. That part is not new. The issue is the sniff outside the car.

Also keep in mind this is the same court that said police can not use technology to "see" into houses without first obtaining a warrent. (just b/c tech advances does not mean police can bypass laws)

Anyways, do the ride along it will confirm both bad and good.


489 posted on 01/24/2005 3:22:07 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All
A creative lawyer would have put the dog that found the drugs on the witness stand for questioning. If it was able to serve in part as an agent against the defendant, the defendant had the right to question witnesses and arresting authority.
Also, there is no such thing as an inconsequential right.
490 posted on 01/24/2005 3:31:10 PM PST by olde north church (I think, therefore iMac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 489 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson