Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
I guess we all know which way the court will be deciding when probes and sensors are devised that can peer into your house.

They've already decided on that (infrared cameras). It's not allowed.

36 posted on 01/24/2005 9:41:29 AM PST by Moonman62 (Republican - The political party for the living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Moonman62
They've already decided on that (infrared cameras). It's not allowed.

Apparently, all they need to do is add some biological sensing unit and it all becomes okay again.

Maybe if they find a way to preserve dogs olfactory nerves in a circuit? Then they can sniff our houses?

43 posted on 01/24/2005 9:44:54 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
My understanding of the ruling on sensing equipment is that it IS allowed but it IS NOT admissible as evidence. There is a big difference there. I don't believe the ruling barred the police from using the equipment specifically. There are laws against phone tapping ... I don't think there are laws preventing anyone using any kind of technology to look around a neighborhood. Just my recollection - could be wrong.
162 posted on 01/24/2005 10:41:55 AM PST by cdrw (Freedom and responsibility are inseparable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: Moonman62
They've already decided on that (infrared cameras). It's not allowed.

I thought infrared imaging of neighborhoods was a matter of routine, to find people who are growing pot. Likewise, "large" electric bills are reported.

333 posted on 01/24/2005 12:01:06 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson