Replies

"If you use force or fraud to deprive another citizen of their rights to life, liberty, or property that constitutes harm. Such activity is properly prosecuted."

Who's advocating such policy?

But how about addressing attempts to defraud America and it's citizens by referring to any self-declaration of a "religion" as a front to plot and plan against said citizens?

And again -- WHO shall be the arbiter of what constitutes such a thing as "harm"? Especially when such arbiters are increasingly commanded to abide in "moral relativity" because it is more "tolerant"?

Let me simply ask you to imagine a purely theoretical scenario:

Would you believe the United States of America -- should Satanists and Muslims become dominant in numbers -- would still retain the same ideological course in "liberty" and "freedom for all" as we have since our Founding Fathers?

If individuals (and remember, only an individual can commit a crime, not an organization) are engaged in a conspiracy to defraud, or otherwise commit a crime, they can and are prosecuted. If their organization is so far gone that RICO applies, it can be broken up. I'm not sure what you're getting at, here.

FRAUD by nature must include the intent to deprive someone of life, liberty and property through lies and misstatements. Who is "attempting to defraud America and it's citizens by referring to any self-declaration of a "religion" as a front to plot and plan against said citizens?"

Clarify, please.