Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The impact of firearms on crime, business, and politics
Backwoods Home ^ | 1-21-05 | John Silveira

Posted on 01/23/2005 6:06:08 AM PST by SJackson

The other day a news item stated that for the last 10 years the crime rate in the United States has been dropping, but the “experts” don’t seem to know why.

Nothing in society is simple, and there are all kinds of factors operating at any one time, but one of the things the media and the so-called experts have apparently overlooked, consciously or unconsciously, is the plethora of new laws that allow law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons. Just a few decades ago, there were almost none, but today 37 states have “right-to-carry” laws on their lawbooks. Nine others, plus Washington, D.C., allow carrying with restrictions, and in the remaining four the right is denied.

In the meantime, as state after state considered easing carrying restrictions, gun phobics marched out their sordid descriptions of gunfights in bars and shootouts at traffic accidents. They never materialized. Still, they marched them out, again and again, every time another state considered a right-to-carry law despite the drop in crime that followed the passage of such laws in other states.

Why does right to carry result in reduced crime? In surveys of violent criminals, the number one thing they say they fear is not the police, who almost always get to the scene of a crime after it’s over, but an armed citizen. And in his book, More Guns, Less Crime, economist John Lott pointed out that in a county-by-county study of all 3,054 counties in the U.S., wherever gun restrictions are relaxed violent crime rates have dropped, with the greatest drops in the counties that had had the most crime. In adjoining states where right to carry was instituted in one state and not the other, crime in the counties in the right-to-carry states went down while, right across the border, crime in the state with restrictions generally went up.

Business and guns

Americans love their guns; and criminals, politicians, and businesses should beware—perhaps with good cause. The number of gun owners is significant. The website for Reason Magazine (www.reason.com) cites a Gallup poll taken in the year 2000. About 40 percent of Americans report having guns in their homes. This amounts to as many as 90 million gun owners, and the average gun owner owns about four guns.

When K-Mart hired Rosie O’Donnell as a spokesperson, one of the first things I and several people I know did was to decide not to shop there anymore. A movement materialized on the Internet calling for a K-Mart boycott. Stores like K-Mart work on a very thin profit margin; it doesn’t take a large percentage of their shoppers staying away or switching to a competitor to affect their profitability. In the United States, gun ownership is higher in rural rather than urban areas. It may not be coincidental that the least profitable of K-Mart’s stores became the rural ones and those are the ones K-Mart’s management decided to close on their way to bankruptcy.

In a country where 47 percent of men reported owning guns in their homes, Ace Hardware was committing economic suicide by having O’Donnell as a spokesperson. I stopped shopping at the local Ace as did the publisher of this magazine, and a call on the Internet came out to boycott them until Ace suddenly dropped her. No reason was given, but the protest from customers—men, gun owners—was likely the reason. Ace, at least, didn’t have to confront bankruptcy.

Smith & Wesson, the gun manufacturer, caved in to the Clinton trigger locks and saw sales dramatically plunge as a boycott began and they, too, went bankrupt. The company now has new ownership and gun buyers have more or less forgiven the company. But the market reaction by gun owners was clear: “Don’t fool with our guns.”

Politics and guns

George W. Bush is wishy-washy on guns, but John Kerry never saw an antigun bill he wouldn’t sign. Nearing the end of the 2004 campaign, John Kerry’s advisors saw the writing on the wall, but just a little too late. They saw he had to pick up some votes in the so-called “red” states and they suddenly had Kerry do a photo shoot looking for all the world like a hunter. But few were fooled and, just as it’s hard to tell how much of K-Mart’s bankruptcy was caused by gun owner boycotts, it’s difficult to tell how many voters that would have voted for Kerry either stayed home or voted for Bush just because of his antigun stance.

In the 2000 election, in several states where gun ownership was high, including Al Gore’s home state of Tennessee, Bush eked out victories over antigunner Gore by the slimmest of margins. We’ll never know how many votes Gore lost because of his antigun stance, but just a few percent in any one of at least five states would have swung the election to him.

Just as politicians, entertainers, and media types woefully underestimate the number of people who believe in God, despite the number of churches that dot the American landscape, they and many businesses continue to underestimate the number of Americans who believe in the Second Amendment and their right to bear arms and want the option to defend their families and themselves. They are blind to this despite the fact that there are more guns in this country than there are people. And these shortsighted people will continue to pay the price for their lack of vision in the future.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist

1 posted on 01/23/2005 6:06:08 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
This thread has just added to the FreeRepublic "bang list" (firearms interest list) by adding the keyword "banglist".

Any time a firearms-related thread is created on FreeRepublic, please be sure to add the "banglist" keyword to it so that interested FReepers don't miss it.

Let Freedom Ring,

Gun Facts v4.0!

Click the pic to go to the Gun Facts v4.0 download page!

2 posted on 01/23/2005 6:09:01 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Right !!


3 posted on 01/23/2005 6:13:49 AM PST by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: oso blanco

I would believe that is a median number NOT an average. I know very few people that own just one gun.

The casual owners normally have a revolver or pistol, a shot gun, a .22 rifle and a hunting rifle.

Collectors own a LOT more. The four gun average may be of ALL adults, gun owners or not.


5 posted on 01/23/2005 7:25:33 AM PST by El Laton Caliente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: oso blanco

I have more guns than I probably need but not as many as I want.


6 posted on 01/23/2005 7:36:16 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

BANG!


7 posted on 01/23/2005 8:04:21 AM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente
The casual owners normally have a revolver or pistol, a shot gun, a .22 rifle and a hunting rifle

I think it's hard to generalize. I know lots of folks with no long guns at all. I know others with only shotguns, often only one. Of course I also know folks with several safes full of guns of all types. One guy had over a dozen AR-15 type rifles. Another has several M-1 Carbines, a few pistols, an M-2 Carbine, an M-79 and a belt fed machine gun. :)

8 posted on 01/23/2005 8:13:24 AM PST by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
In the United States, gun ownership is higher in rural rather than urban areas.

In the United States, gun ownership by non-felons is higher in rural rather than urban areas.

There, that's better.

9 posted on 01/23/2005 8:14:09 AM PST by JimRed (Investigate, overturn and prosecute vote fraud in the State of Washington !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Laton Caliente

Guns? What guns? I lost all mine in that tragic boating accident.


10 posted on 01/23/2005 8:25:49 AM PST by Shooter 2.5 (Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
"Guns? What guns? I lost all mine in that tragic boating accident."

Yeah, that was tragic.

I lost all of mine when someone broke into my house and stole them.
Probably buried them somewhere, but I have no idea where.

11 posted on 01/23/2005 8:32:22 AM PST by TexasCowboy (Texan by birth, citizen of Jesusland by the Grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I disagree that President Bush has been wishy washy on guns. One of his first actions after being elected to his first term was to select John Ashcroft as Attorney General. One of the President's and Ashcroft's first moves was to publicaly state that the policy of the United States was that the Bill of Rights gave Americans the Right to keep and bear Arms. That was a complete reversal of the Clinton ADministration which had 8 years of trying to abolish that right. There was a big case in Texas where the Clinton appointed Attorney General said that Americans did nto ahve that right.

As for the Assault Weapons Ban, I believe President Bush called for that to be sent to him by the Senate only becauase he dind't believe there was support for it and that removed that argument from teh Democrats in teh election. I'll give him that one as his overall stance has been to strengthen our rights to defend ourselves.

Of note, one of the only states that I know of that has publically said its citizens do NOT have a right to defend themsleves is Massachusetts. They are following the UK model and while they have not outlawed guns entirely.....I wouldn't move back there with the hopes of keeping mine. Its shameful what Kerry and kennedy have done to the state where our fight for freedom began....


12 posted on 01/23/2005 8:46:55 AM PST by rgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Nice link to that Gun Facts.pdf

thanks


13 posted on 01/23/2005 8:54:56 AM PST by ezo4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
I lost all mine in that tragic boating accident.

A week from next Thursday . . .

:-)

14 posted on 01/23/2005 9:10:54 AM PST by Petruchio (<===Looks Sexy in a flightsuit . . . Looks Silly in a french maid outfit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson