Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC

Side effects later on are unfortunate but irrelevant. As long as you make it to the age where you can reproduce, it's a win from an evolutionary point of view - conversely, dying before then is a major loss. I've no doubt that mortality rates creep up faster in carriers than in non-carriers later on in life, but the goal is to pass on your genes, which you can't do if you die at the age of 14 months. And once you've done that, your part is played. Evolution is about survival, not long and happy lives.


483 posted on 01/24/2005 9:44:25 PM PST by general_re (How come so many of the VKs have been here six months or less?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
I've no doubt that mortality rates creep up faster in carriers than in non-carriers later on in life, but the goal is to pass on your genes, which you can't do if you die at the age of 14 months

Yes, but that chart shows a big deficit for the HbSS. It does appear that the benefit for the HbAS goes on beyond 16 months, but it is unclear when that benefit would be lost. In any case reproductive capability should be around 120 months. Fourteen months of benefit compared to possibly 100 months of detriment does not sound like a profitable transaction.

485 posted on 01/24/2005 9:59:31 PM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson