[nasamn777]

Here is a link that gives answers to frequently asked questions:

http://www.arn.org/id_faq.htm

I would suggest that you read through each for a better understanding of design. Notice that the recent advances have occurred from the 80's to the present. Have you ever heard of Dembski's explanatory filter?

[shubi]

Dembski is a charlatan.

[Alacarte]

I would suggest that you read through each for a better understanding of design.

I will actually, since no one here has ever been able to actually tell us anything about ID, all they ever do is attack evolution. I'm curious to see if there is any real sciecne in it anywhere that does not just steal from evolution.

I did read a little, and I came across this interesting quote: "Similarly, in a recent issue of the biology journal Cell, Bruce Alberts, a leading cell biologist and president of the National Academy of Sciences, wrote:"

So... the NAS is a respected science institution when you want a quote... but not when they make public statements? Like this...
http://books.nap.edu/html/creationism/conclusion.html

Have you ever heard of Dembski's explanatory filter?

No, but let me guess... it's NOTHING without stuff that it stole from evolutionary science. I'll read up on it and get back to you.

BTW, why is ALL the research on ID done by the same three people? Who I can't help but notice, have never actually published a scientific paper.

[muleskinner]

I would suggest that you read through each...

Well, I read thru the "Doesn't The Fossil Evidence Support Naturalistic Evolution?

I was stuned by the massive amount of information and evidence presented demolishing the fossil record and making paleontologists run for the tall grass - six (6) paragraphs consisting of three (3) sentences each.

Tell me this site is a joke. I'm beggin' ya.