Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24
If you have a large group of intelligent, highly motivated students (which, presumably, anyway, is what Princeton students should be) and an objective exam, why is there no legitimate reason why the entire class couldn't legitimately earn all A's?

It depends on what you think the purpose of the grading should be (and hence, the purpose of the "A").

Presumably, even at Princeton, there is a rank order of effort and ability, from low to high. If the purpose of the grades is to rank the students from highest to lowest (within the universe that is Princeton), then giving them all "A"s defeats that purpose.

These exams at Princeton are not qualifying exams, like medical boards or a bar exam. It should be possible, if the examiners know the material, to rank every student, by letter grade, from #1 to n.

42 posted on 01/22/2005 3:01:30 PM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
Presumably, even at Princeton, there is a rank order of effort and ability, from low to high.

I dispute that this premise will necessarily occur, especially the higher and higher you get. I believe it is possible to get a group of hard-working students of roughly equal ability who want to learn.

44 posted on 01/22/2005 3:05:32 PM PST by jude24 ("To go against conscience is neither right nor safe." - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson