I'm quite familiar with the crevo debates and your comparison is way off base. The rules enforced at pro-family sites like FR preclude pro-homosexual talking points disguised as civil discourse.
What were his pro-homosexual talking points? All I saw is that he disagreed with the assertion that homosexuality is a symptom of childhood sexual abuse. Is this the official FR position?
Its funny - I believe that homosexuality is a personal choice. That is, a person isn't born 'gay' - people are born with different tendencies (sexual, criminal, etc), but its a personal choice on whether to act up them or not.
I take hits from the rabid gay groups because I don't believe that person is "born gay" and I talk hits from the rabid anti-gay groups because I believe its a personal choice.