Replies

Paul Craig Roberts has been a regular contributor to The Washington Times. I believe he has a PhD and was certainly a regular, outspoken critic of the Clinton Administration on many issues.

I think he overstates his case in the article but some reactions on this thread to Mr. Roberts' words do confirm some of the blind Bush zealotry posing as loyalty about which Mr. Roberts warns.

As I have said before, I don't even agree with my own mother on everything and I love her. Bush certainly isn't my mother.

People are not certifiably crazy just because they tell you things you don't want to hear or believe. That kind of reaction is closer to the beliefs of the Taliban than to those of our founding fathers.

You are not alone. Many of us regaled in the victory of GW for the defeat of the alternative. GW, while my choice in both the past elections, is certainly not the best representative of traditional political conservative values, but he definitely is the best available.

To paraphrase another line in this thread. GW may not be a "real" conservative, but he will do until a "real" one comes along.