Well I see a lot of "faith" on both sides of this debate.
Creationists say that a lot. The Evolution folks never do. Evolution is fact. There is hard evidence all around. And science does not contradict Genesis.
What's the problem here?
Why do creationists wish to challenge and change science from the outside in? Let them become scientists, find their evidence and convince scientists of it's validity.
Believe it or not, science actually thrives on controversy. It gives them something to study and ask for grants over. If someone can actually bring up genuine evidence (and it wouldn't take much, although its provenance would have to be impecable) to challenge Evolution, then they will win Nobel prizes.
Until then, they should study hard, and not make waves in the political arena (as this is). Otherwise they will be shouted down loudly.